Presentation Rubric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation Considerations | ||
| Attribute | Plus/Check/Minus | Comments |
| Purpose of the presentation was clear
|
||
| Approach was appropriate for the particular topic
For example, if this was a Beta presentation, was the material presented appropriately. |
||
| Presentation well organized
An outline should be presented and maintained. |
||
| Is Presentation understandable to middle school students?
Some presentations are NOT meant for the middle schoolers, e.g., code walk through. The question here is whether you, the reviewer, things this could be presented to the middle schoolers. |
||
| Presentation did not cover unnecessary materials
Each presentation has a purpose, did presentation maintain focus on this purpose. |
||
| Slides were clear
|
||
| Slides were visibly interesting
While some slides, e.g., UML |
||
| Slides had limited text
Again, something like UML may break this rule, but overall were slides too full of text. |
||
| Slide language appropriate for middle school students
While some presentations are not meant for middle schoolers, is there too much jargon. |
||
| Each slide was important to talk
|
||
| Speakers were WELL prepared
Really, Really, Important. |
||
| Speakers spoke clearly and loudly
|
||
| Speakers engaging
|
||
| Demo went smoothly
Demos should be prepared. |
||
| Talk will probably increase middle school student
interest in project
Would the presentation bore them to death. |
||
Last Modified Tuesday, 27-Nov-2012 11:02:17 PST