Code Walk Through
Evaluation Considerations
Category	Standard	Plus/Check/Minus	Comments
Introduction	Excellent game overview
	Clear description provided for gameplay sequence to be discussed
	Good explanation provided for how gameplay sequence fits into the larger game
	Major technical issues confronted in the design are summarized
	Coding standards summarized
High Level Overview	Game play sequenced walked through via sequence, activity, and/or class diagrams as appropriate
	Walkthrough covered all important parts of the gameplay sequence
	Diagrams were excellent
	Walkthrough was extremely clear
	Major technical issues encountered during design were revisited in walkthrough
	Reviewer was left with a clear idea of the code to be discussed
Low Level Walkthrough	Code walkthrough was consistent with high level walkthrough
	Code is well written
	Code is easy to understand
	Code walkthrough was clear
	Revisited any major technical issues
Alternate routes	Explained alternate routes through code
Presentation Particulars	Presenters thoroughly understood th portionos of code they presented
	Presenters answered questions clearly
	Presenters were attentive to criticism/suggestions

Evaluating Team:

Evaluated Team:

Grade(10, 7, 3, 0):

Comments:

Mike Erlinger