Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of TestPlanReviewResponse

Show
Ignore:
Timestamp:
11/08/2011 11:21:57 AM (2 years ago)
Author:
hwu
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • TestPlanReviewResponse

    v1 v2  
    11= Test Plan Review Response = 
     2 
     3== Review Comments == 
     4 
     5Reviewed by MI-History 
     6 
     7'''Risk Analysis''' 
     8 
     9 * Agree with ordering of risk assessment. 
     10 
     11 * Should consider the risk associated by dynamic parameters instead of testing a static model. __we assume that random generation works and then test__ 
     12 
     13 * Testing that the random stuff always performs within boundaries.  
     14 
     15 
     16'''Rationale and Introduction''' 
     17 
     18 * More test cases that address groups of components (integration tests with few or more components)  
     19 
     20 * In the case that something fails, it only tells us that the whole game failed. No ability to tell what went wrong.  
     21 
     22 * Agree that testing every single thing is infeasible, can cut down on test cases that say this input has this dialog box. 
     23 
     24 * More breadth than depth.  
     25 
     26 
     27'''Test and test implementation''' 
     28 
     29 * UI tests pretty good, could use a bit more integration/how single components work 
     30 
     31 * Like economic model tests could be moved into white box testing. Is the number itself correct?  
     32 
     33 * Some of the UI tests could go into system testing or integration testing, document could have better organization 
     34  
     35 * Hard to narrow down where bugs are or where it is happening 
     36 
     37 * Specific edge cases, could document better 
     38  
     39 
     40 
     41''' Test Implementation''' 
     42 
     43  
     44 
     45'''Rationale''' 
     46  
     47 
     48 
     49 
     50== Review Response ==