Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of TestPlanReviewResponse


Ignore:
Timestamp:
11/08/2011 11:21:57 AM (4 years ago)
Author:
hwu
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • TestPlanReviewResponse

    v1 v2  
    11= Test Plan Review Response =
     2
     3== Review Comments ==
     4
     5Reviewed by MI-History
     6
     7'''Risk Analysis'''
     8
     9 * Agree with ordering of risk assessment.
     10
     11 * Should consider the risk associated by dynamic parameters instead of testing a static model. __we assume that random generation works and then test__
     12
     13 * Testing that the random stuff always performs within boundaries.
     14
     15
     16'''Rationale and Introduction'''
     17
     18 * More test cases that address groups of components (integration tests with few or more components)
     19
     20 * In the case that something fails, it only tells us that the whole game failed. No ability to tell what went wrong.
     21
     22 * Agree that testing every single thing is infeasible, can cut down on test cases that say this input has this dialog box.
     23
     24 * More breadth than depth.
     25
     26
     27'''Test and test implementation'''
     28
     29 * UI tests pretty good, could use a bit more integration/how single components work
     30
     31 * Like economic model tests could be moved into white box testing. Is the number itself correct?
     32
     33 * Some of the UI tests could go into system testing or integration testing, document could have better organization
     34 
     35 * Hard to narrow down where bugs are or where it is happening
     36
     37 * Specific edge cases, could document better
     38 
     39
     40
     41''' Test Implementation'''
     42
     43 
     44
     45'''Rationale'''
     46 
     47
     48
     49
     50== Review Response ==