• The wrapper for semaphores that they created. Again, as simple as a number of functions or as complicated as a class.
• A set of processes 'nicely' sharing memory. The printouts should show what is going on.

What are you to do?

• Minus up to 5 points if they leave off required things, e.g., time it took to do the project, buddy, etc.
• Minus 5 points if the description does not describe the overall operation of the program, i.e., who forks whom, etc.
• Minus 5 points if the listing for execution with the default parameters (5, 6, 4, 3) has problems:
  • look for transitions that go from thinking to eating without being hungry. This can happen occasionally given race conditions, but should not happen consistently.
  • look for adjacent phils eating
  • look for the wrong counts on number of phils eating/hungry, etc.
• Minus up to 10 points for lousy program description, they need to be clear about what their program does...
• Minus 3 points for being late.